Re: serious ASH bug!!!


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: serious ASH bug!!!



At 11:41 PM 6/30/97 +1000, you wrote:
>What version are you using?  I've disected the code of v2 and it seems
>fine.  IMHO the code for ASH is a lot neater than that of OShell.

I'm using v2.0.  I agree that ASH is nicer (and has a better interface),
but you have to admit that a shell is one of the hardest things to write.
Some people just don't have that kind of time on their hands to write good
shells.  However, OShell-82 seems like a pretty good programming interface
to write code for (it has the advantage of titles instead of file names).

Signed,
Thomas J. Hruska

|----------------------------------------------------|
|             Shining Light Productions              |
|      "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"     |
|                                                    |
|   C/C++ programs                                   |
|   QBasic programs                                  |
|   JavaScript                                       |
|   TI-Basic                                         |
|   HTML                                             |
|                                                    |
| Search for our web site at                         |
| www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504/      |
|                                                    |
| We use a dynamic web server for most of our        |
| documents!!!                                       |
| Soon to go to a full JavaScript 1.1 web site!      |
|----------------------------------------------------|


Follow-Ups: References: