Re: TI-85


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-85



MattC0022 wrote:
>
> i dont know if this makes any sense but wouldnt the newest ones have a
> higher number, and arent the higher the number the better, like
> 80(oldest), 81,82,83(if they make it) 84, (if they make it) , 85,86,etc
> and finally 92(newest)  maybe i am wrong but who really cares

Actually, it is based on the power of the calc.  I think the calc's were
produced in the following order: 80, 81, 85, 82, 83, 92, 86.
--
PHC
paulhc@networkusa.net
http://members.aol.com/agentphc/


Follow-Ups: References: