A92: Re: 89 prog to 92?

To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A92: Re: 89 prog to 92?
From: "Sean Barnes" <sean.a.barnes@att.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:08:31 -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009151621160.1218-100000@mosquito.Pool> <001d01c020e8$3c96ef40$0100a8c0@apolo>
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org



> What about assembler? Its all 68k :)

You can't use the same program file. The assembly program on the computer
may be the same (then again, that will depend on the shell for library
function names). I'm not a 92 programmer so I don't know how similar a shell
like Fargo is to Doors.
If you are executing pure assembly with no library or ROM functions the
source can be compiled for all 68k calcs. However, these types of programs
are not very useful.

-Sean

References:

Re: A92: Re: Anyone?

From: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?David_K=FChling?= <dvdkhlng@gmx.de>

A92: 89 prog to 92?

From: "Jota" <fisjpb@ua.pt>

Prev: A92: Re: 89 prog to 92?
Next: Re: A92: PS2 again
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread