Re: A92: Shells and assembler

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A92: Shells and assembler
From: Betelg@aol.com
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 20:59:49 EDT
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org




>  >TI's (trashy) OS
>  What's so bad about TI's OS, considering it was designed for a calculator?

Nothing (well, for most calcs it's ok, but I find the 92OS particularly 
frustrating because it's SOOOOO slowwww... notice how long it takes to scroll 
through an extensive var-link list.,) but as a computer (calculaters aren't 
inherently built for games), it's not the best.  It could certainly be 
improved....  Another thing... does other people's crash? mine crashes, but I 
tax it too much.

>  >(and a 92, speaking of
>  >which, what are 92+ people doing on the 92 list?) 
>  Um...because it's the same list?  :-)

Oh, right you are then!  That's a bit silly isn't it? considering that the 
two operating systems' assemblers are different.  Are there 89's on this list 
too? is this list just M68k?

Mitch

Follow-Ups:

Re: A92: Shells and assembler

From: "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net>