Re: A92: POTM

To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A92: POTM
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:10:04 -0600
References: <19991119133209.TGJJ25853.mta05.onebox.com@onebox.com>
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org


But I don't think that's what he meant by a "proper" port. :)

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Noah Medling" <medlingn@zdnetonebox.com>
To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: A92: POTM


>
> Acaually, anybody could use DBA's disassembler, and change a couple of
keycodes, reassemble it, and it would be perfect except for you would only
see the top-left of the screen
>
> Noah Medling
> http://xp.calc.org/
>
>
> ---- Patrick Davidson <pad@OCF.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Every program made for the 92+ is or will be ported to the 89, and
> > > vice-versa, but in my oppinion, it should be seperate too.
> >
> > While is true of the most programs, remember that the same things is
> > true with TI-83 and TI-83+.  And porting between those calculators
> > involves far fewer changes than a proper TI-89 -> TI-92+ port.
> >
> >
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> To get your own FREE ZDNet onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
> all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com
>
>
>

References:

Re: A92: POTM

From: "Noah Medling" <medlingn@zdnetonebox.com>