RE: A92: 92+ asm


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: A92: 92+ asm




But how about the library calls that Fargo intelligently handles. What about them? If youwere to just use processor calls, you'd be
rewriting alot of stuff.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>[mailto:owner-assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Ben
>Sent: Saturday, August 08, 1998 9:40 PM
>To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: A92: 92+ asm
>
>
>
>There may not be a need for fargo on the 92+.  If someone can find out
>how to assemble  M68000 op-codes into strings and then use the 92+
>'exec' command to run them, they will run as asm programs w/o fargo.
>For new programs, all that needs to happen is for them to be assembled
>into 92+ asm files.
>


References: