Re: A92: Suggestions... tokenization

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A92: Suggestions... tokenization
From: Rene Kragh Pedersen <u971168@daimi.aau.dk>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 14:50:47 +0100
Organization: daimi.aau.dk
References: <01bced3e$47d79fc0$5e53fdcf@sulphur> <346B0B6E.345719AF@hell1og.be.schule.de>
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org

David Kühling wrote:

[snip]

>                          Yes.
> 
> Your test was the wrong one. To prove tokenization is very simple.
> write a program like the following:
> prgm
> ceiling (123)
> endprgm
> then go to the home, and start the var-link screen. The size of the var
> is 40Bytes.
> If you execute the program and watch the size again, it has been
> shrunked to 20Bytes.
> So the tokenization is made, before a program is executed.
> I realized this soon, when I wrote large TI-Baasic programs. If you have
> programs greater than 10KBytes, it will pass some seconds, before they
> can be executed after editing. When you want to edit the program again,
> it also takes some seconds to translate it back to ASCII

AND, it changes endwhile to EndWhile and such, if you didn't bother to
write the correct capitals at first. Neat :-)

-- 
          Rene Kragh Pedersen
------------------------------------------------------------------
What's up???
Um, like it's the direction of increasing gravitational potential.
------------------------------------------------------------------

References:

Re: A92: Suggestions for the 92+ upgrade.

From: "Francois Bradet" <hernick@videotron.ca>

Re: A92: Suggestions... tokenization

From: "David Kühling" <dkuehlin@hell1og.be.schule.de>