[A89] Re: about a68k

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A89] Re: about a68k
From: "TJ" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 23:51:55 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020527105020.009e9a00@pop.gmx.de> <OE246Su94e5O25rrcvg000073a5@hotmail.com> <p05100300b9180902b70a@[192.168.0.3]>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


you could always use as92 and program oncalc ;) that's the only way i
program.

>
> >There _HAS_ to be an assembler out there for mac somewhere. Because the
> >older macs ARE 68k! look around at places like download.com or through a
> >search engine.
>
> yes! that's what I thought... well, actually CodeWarrior and MPW both
> can create 68k binaries. The problem is the linker, and I'm not sure
> if there's any difference between binaries for 68000 and 680x0,
> although in CW I can explicity choose between 68k code and 68020, I
> assume that 68k is more universal. So, let's assume I can produce the
> 68k binary, the problem is the linker... :(
>
> regards,
> ra.-
>
>

References:

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: Sebastian Reichelt <SebastianR@gmx.de>

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: "TJ" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: "R.A." <funkaster@mac.com>