Re: A89: What's Wrong?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: What's Wrong?




http://www.news.harvard.edu/science/current_stories/18.Feb.99/light.html

let's end this thread now.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Goodsell" <goodsell@bridgernet.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?


>
> I do. It's an incorrect statement of the theory. It's well known that the
> speed of light can vary. Relativity says that all observers must measure
the
> same speed for the light the being observed, which may or may not be
> travelling in a vacuum, which is the only place light actually goes the
> "speed of light". Or something like that.
>
> -Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TGaArdvark@aol.com <TGaArdvark@aol.com>
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:58 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: What's Wrong?
>
>
> >
> >Who disputed this?
> >
> >In a message dated 1/10/01 6:08:40 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> >Nitrocloud@aol.com writes:
> >
> >> According to Einstien's Special Theory of Relativity the speed of light
> >>  ALWAYS remains the same, and time and length may change, this is
proved.
> >So
> >>
> >>  the speed of light under no circumstances can be sped up or slowed
down.
> >>  Even when light is sucked into a black hole it travels at the same
> speed.
> >I
> >>
> >>  rest my case.
> >
>
>
>
>




References: