Re: A89: Light Speed


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Light Speed



i don't know if it's applicable to say gravity 'has no mass'. gravity isn't something you measure in mass. it's like saying my certain kind of force is at a speed of zero. force doesn't have a speed component, so it's irrelevant. the 'no mass' topic comes into play when you're talking about an actual object that has a mass of 0. like a neutrino (almost 0, but not quite).
 
/brian

The path to enlightenment is /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
----- Original Message -----
From: Cullan
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Light Speed

intresting article but kind of irrelevant
 
a form of light, went faster than the speed of light
 
we are talking about a physical object traveling faster than the speed of light
 
and a gravtational feild would work in this situation because gravity has 'no mass'
----- Original Message -----
From: JayEll64@aol.com
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Light Speed

If anyone's interested, here's the article about light supposedly going
faster than the speed of light...

http://www.thehollandsentinel.net/stories/072000/new_speed.html

- JayEll


Follow-Ups: References: