[A89] Re: C question
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A89] Re: C question
that's what i thought, but i wasn't sure if perhaps there was another reason
to do it. so it's not really required or anything, it's just to help you out
and keep you from doing something stupid, and catch it during compile time.
thanks!
/brian
----- Original Message -----
From: <Starwarcj@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: [A89] Re: C question
> Using it as a constant insures that you don't change any members of the
class
> you are sending as an argument.
> in the case:
> "someClass::someClass(const someClass &a)" ,
> you are ensuring that someClass does not alter any members of a.
>
>
>
>
References: