[A89] Re: movem
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A89] Re: movem
It compiles correctly for me now too... It was pretty much a direct cut and
paste from my code when i posted it, but I already threw that code away in
favor of just using move.l because it was working...
Now I have a dilemma; it appears that when I just save and restore those two
registers (A2 & A5), that move and movem produce the same sized code. Is one
method faster than the other in this situation? I've looked at the Motorola
documentation, but am not sure how to decipher the timings for movem.
Thanks for all of your help,
Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Olle Hedman" <oh@hem.passagen.se>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 3:09 AM
Subject: [A89] Re: movem
>
> At 08:49 2001-04-22, you wrote:
> >movem.l %a2/%a5,-(%sp)
> >movem.l (%sp)+,%a2/%a5
> >
> >the first statement compiles just fine; the second does NOT.
>
> Interesting. exactly that compiles just fine for me.
> (and it should)
> You probably do some other error, not visible in your mail.
>
> ///Olle
>
>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Follow-Ups:
References: