Re: A89: Re: "C"
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: "C"
We're getting more messages on C than anything else
now. If we don't split it, then we should rename it to
"High performance 89 programming" or something.
--- Kevin Goodsell <goodsell@bridgernet.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, but do you really think that there's enough
> traffic on this list to
> justify splitting it into two?
>
> -Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jimmy Baker <ashbar83@yahoo.com>
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 5:16 PM
> Subject: A89: "C"
>
>
> >
> >We need another list for C programmers for the 89.
> C
> >is nice, but it's different from asm, and should
> kept
> >separate. It seems the "assembly-89" list has
> become
> >the "C-89" list.
> >well, there's my take on everything...
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Send instant messages & get email alerts with
> Yahoo! Messenger.
> >http://im.yahoo.com/
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/