RE: A89:Dead list

To: "'assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org'" <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A89:Dead list
From: Mark Scott <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:05:01 -0800
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

I think its more likely that people are busy with school, tests, work, etc,
and have no time to talk, I for one don't.

Mark E. Scott Jr.
mscott@databasecity.com

-----Original Message-----
From: NIKE5685@aol.com [mailto:NIKE5685@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 8:45 PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89:Dead list

In a message dated 2/29/00 6:27:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
RoniBarrett@aol.com writes:

> It seems that one by one, the lists are dying. TI-H is dead, and even the
>  most desparate attempts to start an off topic tread have failed. Now A89.
> And
>  ever since Bryan got kicked off the lists, A86 has been slowly declining.
>  My only contacts with (mostly) real people, and theyre drying up one by
one!
> 
i'm still here. ;)
c'mon folks. let's not let this list die.
-Jordan