Re: A89: Re: Re: AMS 2.04

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: AMS 2.04
From: Scott Dial <wrath@calc.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 14:21:23 -0500
Organization: ByMe Inc. Technologies \ TCPA
References: <200006081915.e58JFJS14041@neretvica.utic.net.ba>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

The 89 and 92+ have always had a 14 byte vat entry. I was mislead by
files.txt which was written for a 92, when there was 12 byte vat
entries. My apologizes again. The handle is indeed at +$C but it has
always been there on the 89 and 92+

Zeljko Juric wrote:
> 
> > Ok, I am really stupid... ignore all my ranting about the vat
> > changing... the stuff about the heap is correct though
> 
> What do you want to say? That the VAT is not changed? Your examples
> says different...
> 
> Zeljko

-- 
Scott "Wrath" Dial
wrath@calc.org
ICQ#3608935
Member of TCPA - tcpa.calc.org
_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

References:

Re: A89: Re: Re: AMS 2.04

From: "Zeljko Juric" <zjuric@utic.net.ba>

Prev: Re: A89: Re: Re: AMS 2.04
Next: A89: Re: big problem with ti-gcc ide
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread