RE: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #874
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #874
First off.. who said it's in english and second.. A couple of other peple
have found it
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Alan C Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 8:29 PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #874
Hey arrogant asshole, (I think we all know who I'm talking about), once
again you have made a damn fool of yourself. Insolace is *not* a word.
I have a Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, unabridged meaning that it
contains just about every word in the English language, including slang
and commonly used foreign words. Insolace is not a substitue for
insolence. You are proved wrong time and time again by other people
who may just know a little more than you in certain subjects, yet you are
too arrogant to admit it. I'm tired of your shit and I know the entire
list is too. You flame people who you deem unintelligent with
unintelligent messages. If you know everything you think you do, then
there's no need for you to be on this mailing list. Why don't you do us
all a favor and unsubscribe.
Alan
P.S. FYI, insolace is not an actual word, but if take the word
insolation and change it into its new form by removing the -tion and
adding -ce, it would mean "having to do with exposure to the sun as a
form of treatment".
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:54:34 -0800
> From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
> nah nah nah. They are quite different, keep looking.
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Kaus
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 4:58 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
>
> You humor me young foolish one. "Insolace" is not a word.
> "Insolence" is
> the word I believe you were looking for.
>
> - --kaus
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
> From: Serial <Serial@earthlink.net>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 6:17 PM
> Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> >
> > I didn't misspell anything you moron.. Look up insolace if your
> that dumb.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Cassady
> Roop
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 4:03 PM
> > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> >
> > Your spelling makes me sick.
> >
> > Serial wrote:
> > >
> > > your insolace makes me sick
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Cassady
> Roop
> > > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 7:35 PM
> > > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > > > Again, Physically Impossible. Nothing you can do will make
> that modem
> > > > recieve that much data / second.
> > >
> > > I used the chronometer on my wristwatch and the bytecounts from
> my modem
> > > connection monitor from the taskbar in Win98 last month to
> measure it,
> > > 'cause it was going way fast according to netscape and I was
> > > suspicious. I got about 10.2 kilobytes per second. Too bad it
> didn't
> > > last; that was nice. Now I routinely get a crappy 26400 (I had
> 36800 at
> > > the time, making it odder still), so I'll not see that again for
> a
> > > while. But it is possible.
> > >
> > > Cassady Roop
> >
> >
> >
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
References: