## RE: A89: Me distributing roms.

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# RE: A89: Me distributing roms.

Title: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.

But a T3 isn't 51.84mbit/sec, its 45.  I know that one, for a long time our whole connection only was 45mbit/sec.

Mark E. Scott Jr.
mscott@databasecity.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 2:01 PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.

Well, Magnus said before an OC-1 is 51.84mbit/sec, not 45mbit/sec.

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.

> My understanding is that an OC192 is equivalent to 192 T3 lines.  One T3
> line is about 45 mbit/sec, therefore you come up with a grand total of
> 8640 mbit/s.  Just a quick divide by 1000 yields 8.64 gbit/sec, roughly.
> I know the number isn't exact, but should be oftly close.
>
> Mark E. Scott Jr.
> mscott@databasecity.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serial [mailto:Serial@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:10 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> I believe his math is wrong. The OC256 that at&t is laying across the
> atlantic to connect the 2 continents is a 2 gbit line which would
> roughly be
> ~200meg/s
> the quick conversion for (g)(m)(k)bits/s is to just add 2 zero's and
> reduce
> to a lower letter if nessessary.
> for example. a 56kbit modem like an x2 is really 5.6 kilobytes max
> downstream
> and a 384k/s downstream dsl would be ~38.4 kilobytes /s
> a 1mbit cable line would be 100kilobytes per second. etc.
> I may not know how to do anything but hello world in asm but networking
> I do
> know =]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Bryan Rabeler
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 3:17 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
>
> How did you calculate that?
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:46 PM
> Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> > Around 8.5gbps if my math is correct.  Equivalent to 192 T3 lines.
> >
> > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > mscott@databasecity.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan Rabeler [mailto:rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:34 PM
> > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> > How fast is an OC192 again?
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:06 PM
> > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> > > Send me the roms in an email and I'll throw em on a server that's on
> > an
> > > OC192.
> > >
> > > Mark E. Scott Jr.
> > > mscott@databasecity.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Olle Hedman [mailto:oh@hem.passagen.se]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 4:02 PM
> > > To: asm89
> > > Subject: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > > This week might be the last one I distribute old ti-roms.
> > > Someone has reported me to abuse@liu.se (my university), and to TI.
> > > Same someone did not contact me.
> > > I recieved the call from "abuse" today. He was very nice and
> > > understanding and I
> > > think he thought it was quite silly, but that he just had to talk
> with
> > > me
> > > because of this letter.
> > > I got a week to either remove them, or come up with a valid reason
> for
> > > me to
> > > continue having them.
> > > I have yet not gotten any response from TI, but they have visited my
> > > site.
> > > I'm eagerly awaiting their letter :)
> > >
> > > //Olle
> > >
> >
>
>
>

Follow-Ups: