A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: TIGCC


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: TIGCC




Hi!

> This is not the problem.  The problem is that at least a
> prototype for the function has to appear BEFORE the call
> to the function.

Oops. I didn't noticed this...

> Strange. What I thought was that people would either turn
> warnings off (which would automatically allow implicit
> declarations as well) or fix every place a warning is
> reported. Of course, if someone has never used the IDE
> before, this is different, but it has been existing for
> more than half a year now. Of course, I will have this box
> checked in the next release.

This IS strange, but people ARE strange in general ;-)

Merry Christmas to everybody!

Zeljko Juric