A89: Re: Re: Re: c vs asm

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A89: Re: Re: Re: c vs asm
From: "Kevin Goodsell" <goodsell@bridgernet.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 23:26:29 -0600
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


C is easier to get the hang of, I think. You need to avoid the C++ tutorials
because the C++ extras will just confuse you when you try to compile and it
doesn't work.

-Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Hatch <hatch@cyberport.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 11:21 PM
Subject: A89: Re: Re: c vs asm


>
>haha, ok. sounds good :-D
>is C basically the same as C++? i mean, if i know a little C++, will i do
>alright with C? or like, do i need to find tutorials specifically on C and
>not C++...
>
>thanks :)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Juan Corral <juancorral@lvcm.com>
>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 10:17 PM
>Subject: A89: Re: c vs asm
>
>
>>
>>Well, since it seems that this list has become the "C-89" list, I would
say
>>learn C.  Besides, Zeljko Juric is busy writing some great documentation
>for
>>it.  If I had the time to do it again, I'd probably learn C instead of the
>>crappy ASM I know.  Oh well.
>>
>>Juan
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Hatch
>>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>>Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2000 11:16 PM
>>Subject: A89: c vs asm
>>
>>
>>hey everyone... ok, im thinking about doing C instead of ASM for games on
>>the 89... but i wanna know what you think, i know really no C, im grasping
>>asm a little. i wanted to know how much easier C is compared to the asm.
>>would i be better off just learning asm for now? since i already started?
>>
>>
>
>