Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
From: "Lynn McCartney" <littlbit@txcyber.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 19:01:36 -0700
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Believe it or not, I do. :)
I once in a while might get in the mood to put some on there but, with the
people at my school, they don't stay on very long.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00


>
>You use your 89 for... math?? :)
>
>Bryan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Lynn McCartney <littlbit@txcyber.com>
>To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 8:55 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
>
>
>>
>> Oh, like I said I don't do much with libraries.  It's rare that I
actually
>> have games on my 89 at all.  So, I don't mess around with it a lot.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
>> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 4:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Nope, I have TI-89 v1.05 ROM, DoorsOS and AU 3.0... no Enhanced Kernel
or
>> >LexOS...
>> >
>> >-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
>> >ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
>> >http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: Lynn McCartney <littlbit@txcyber.com>
>> >To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 8:38 PM
>> >Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
>> >
>> >> I don't know but, I've heard that you can do that with the Enhanced
>> >Kernel.
>> >> I've only heard about it though.  I've never bothered with archiving
>> >> libraries and ect.  And I believe you can with LexOs too (I'm assuming
>> >since
>> >> they were made by the same person).
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Miles Raymond <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
>> >> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>> >> Date: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 2:33 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
>> >>
>> >> >For some reason, I have no problem running programs with the
libraries
>> >not
>> >> >only archived, but in a LIB folder...
>> >> >
>> >> >-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
>> >> >ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
>> >> >http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>> >> >
>> >> >----- Original Message -----
>> >> >From: Patrick Sweeney <psweeney@geocities.com>
>> >> >To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>> >> >Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 11:54 PM
>> >> >Subject: Re: A89: AS92 -----> AU 3.00
>> >> >
>> >> >> You can archive libraries, you just can't use them archived.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> keymo wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > well while on their webpage i saw the archive utility they had.
i
>> >> >remember
>> >> >> > it coming out way back when but i didn't try it until now.  it
>works
>> >> >really
>> >> >> > well, but unless i'm doing something wrong, i think it's still
>kinda
>> >> >> > useless.  (for gaming ppl)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > my reasoning. . . it only saves the archived things and you can't
>> >> >archive
>> >> >> > the libraries.  so once the calc crashes, you lose the libraries.
>> >now
>> >> >> > games which require libraries are useless in class. =*(
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > or maybe there's a way around it. . .
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > keymo
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > At 10:22 PM 10/26/1999, you wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > >In a message dated 10/26/99 6:10:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>> >> >AndrewM@ev1.net
>> >> >> > >writes:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > ><<
>> >> >> > >  a few things are diff... but it has the option to comile to a
>> >string
>> >> >or a
>> >> >> > >  asm file! read the doc! >>
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >i dont feel like downloading it if it is something i dont want.
>=)
>> >> im
>> >> >an
>> >> >> > >idiot,  im on cable, and i still wont take the 3 seconds.  =/
>> >well
>> >> >anyway,
>> >> >> > >i think it said that you can't use libraries?  is that true?
and
>> if
>> >> >so,
>> >> >> > >isn't that gonna mean for some huuuuge files?  and im too stupid
>to
>> >do
>> >> >shit
>> >> >> > >without libraries.  so that's a problem.
>> >> >> > >             _reddog_
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>