Re: A89: Re: Re: LCD change for $1 =)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Re: LCD change for $1 =)
Ah, that's why it wouldn't work...
So I would have to change it to:
_main:
jsr graphlib::gray4
add.w #3968,graphlib::plane0 ;496*8
add.w #3968,graphlib::plane1
move.w #1,graphlib::choosescreen
...
exit:
clr.w graphlib::choosescreen
jsr graphlib::gray2
rts
But that doesn't seem to work either. I get another address error.
-Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
----- Original Message -----
From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: LCD change for $1 =)
> yea, sound nice. I dont think you need the sub's though.
> Why don't you just try and see if it works instead of asking if it works?
> much faster way to know :)
> dont forget that the number in $600010 is the address/8 though.
>
> hmm.. I just realized one thing.. maybe it wont work without changeing
the
> routines a bit. If the grayscale in graphlib works similar to the one in
> gray4lib (wich I assume it does) you also have to change that little table
it
> sets up at initalization, that containes the numbers to be put in to
$600010...
> if you just change $600010 yourself, and then starts grayscale in
graphlib, it
> will change back to normal screen..
> I guess the only way to go round this is to write your own grayscale
routine..
> (or faster, copy the code in gray4lib, wich I know is out there. (I'm not
sure
> about graphlib) and change the needed stuff...)
> You could also ofcourse patch graphlib, but that would be quite pointless
since
> then it wouldnt be the standard, and you could just as well has used your
own
> routine in your code.. (it would even be better)
> But dont worry for the size, grayscale code isn't very big.
>
> file://Olle
*CLIP*
References: