Re: A89: dumb question

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: dumb question
From: "Dan E" <dan@calc.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 11:50:23 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
References: <8f0e47a1.249c91bd@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


(just in case we're not already off topic enough)
I'm not on the TI-Basic list, but it is kind of strange that TI lists the 83
as having "date-logic" (along with the 73) on their Y2K page.  I assume this
is what they were talking about...



-Dan


>
> > <OT> there are no dumb questions,  just dumb people.</OT>
>
> Speaking of that, the letter preceeding this one in my box
> was a TI-Basic digest containing posts about people
> worried that their TI-83's were not Y2K compatible.
>

References:

Re: A89: dumb question

From: TGaArdvark@aol.com

Prev: Re: A89: dumb question
Next: A89: (no subject)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread