RE: A89: Re: Archive memory


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

RE: A89: Re: Archive memory




I had already looked before asking, and it doesn't say anything
But, as i said , the author of sf2t said it would save batteries, which i
found a bit strange.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Miles Raymond
Sent: Terça-feira, 27 de Julho de 1999 18:25
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A89: Re: Archive memory



Actually, I don't think either way would save or hurt your batteries.  But
all archived programs are copied to RAM before being executed, so this might
save a little time, which the batteries are used.

If you are familar with an 83, I suggest you read TI's 83 to 89 guide on
their website.  And I suggest that you look over your TI-89's manual when
you have a question regarding it's operation.  Much of the 89 newbie
questions can be answered there if you look. =)

-Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/

----- Original Message -----
From: Filipe Soares Pinto <filipepinto@mail.telepac.pt>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 12:13 PM
Subject: A89: Archive memory


> I understand that this isn't 'assembly', but i just bought my ti-89
> yesterday, and (having i had a ti-86) it is very different from my old
one.
> I don't understand if there are any disadvantages in using the archive
> memory, instead of the archive memory. The archive memory, i have already
> realised, causes a lot of trashing, i think, but other than that (which i
> haven't understood very well also) it seems pretty much the same.
> NEvertheless, the author of street fighter says in the txt file, that he
> advises that the program should be in the ram memory in order to save
> batteries. Can someone help me with this?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> P.s. I'm just a newbie with the ti-89




References: