Re: A89: TI-89 info was(Re: supervisor vs usermode...)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: TI-89 info was(Re: supervisor vs usermode...)
Well, I was only wondering because I hear Dulce gripe every day about the 8K
limit on the 83+ and wondered if the 89 had any similar disabilities. I
don't know much about the 8K limit to explain it, sorry... =(
64K is the limit that TI put on the program through the VAT, correct? So
with a new OS (or just a new VAT), a file could be larger, correct?
-Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
----- Original Message -----
From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: A89: TI-89 info was(Re: supervisor vs usermode...)
> Zoltan Kocsi wrote:
> > I guess the available RAM might be a reasonable limit. If you run
> > from the FLASH, then the size of that. The 68000 has an address limit
> > of 16MB, certainly not presenting any constraint in the case of the
> > TI89.
>
> the maximum length should be 64K since you have only a word telling the
size of
> the programfile. You should be able to have larger programs by splitting
them up
> un different files though.. and then I think its safe to assume that
available
> ram/flash is the limit..
>
> file://Olle
Follow-Ups:
References: