Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
The glass is not half full nor half empty; it's poison, don't drink it!
Cassady Roop
Bryan Rabeler wrote:
>
> They are ALL pessimistic? :)
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 12:10 AM
> Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> >
> > In a message dated 12/15/1999 9:04:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu writes:
> >
> > << Ok, now I'm having trouble figuring out which e-mail you are replying
> to
> > here... what did I say that was pessimistic?
> >
> > Bryan >>
> >
> > hehehe, please read your last 5-10 e-mails to the board.
> >
> >
Follow-Ups:
References: