Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
LOL. :)
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
> Then in that case. I'll sell you a Hw1 calc for $250
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Cyong0@aol.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 7:03 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?
>
>
> |
> | I have an HW 2 calc, but I can't simply "return" it since all I can get
> back
> | is another HW 2 calcs. HW 1 calcs are rare, and the only ones I can buy
> are
> | used and usually have major flaws in them (Hey, it just is hard to find
> | somebody willing to give up a good conditioned SF2 playing, Super Mario
> | Brothers playing, HW 1 calc, unless they are giving up their academic
> career,
> | or are planning on committing suicide in the near future)
> |
> | There has to be SOME way to make it work on HW 2 since there isn't any
> | grayscale or anything. I hope people start programming stuff for HW 2
> | because I can learn how to program, but I dunno how to make changes to
the
> | way I program to adapt to hardware I don't know about:P
> |
> | All you genius programmers out there I think are able to tho:P
> |
> | -Trailblazer
> |
> |
>
>
>
References: