Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?




Probably, but I'm just making it work with AMS 2.03 for now.

--h4X0r

----- Original Message -----
From: <TurboSoft@aol.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Should I make a "shell" for AMS 2.03?


>
> In a message dated 12/15/99 8:41:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> haxor89@netzero.net writes:
>
> > I have been looking over the source code to Launch and Shell (the
PlusShell
> >  Browser), and it seems rather simple.  If anyone has any suggestions,
or
> >  comments don't hesitate to email the list or myself (preferred).
> >
> >  --h4X0r
>
> is there a way to define some stuff in the shell (whatever coding that
would
> be needed) to run old ASM programs?
>
> --TurboSoft
>
> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE:  The most current Basic and C programs
created
> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> <A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
>
>

__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html


References: