Re: _PLEASE_ stop babbling about religion [OT] (was Re: A89: Re:OT:darw

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: _PLEASE_ stop babbling about religion [OT] (was Re: A89: Re:OT:darwin)



Hey Kaus, you still working on that Super Mario game for the 92?!?!? It
looks awesome :)

-Tim

On Sun, 12 Dec 1999, Kaus wrote:

> 
> i must reply. the answer to life, the universe, and everything is indeed 42,
> but if you will remember, the question was put into place by God.
> on the side of some mountains or somesuch on some planet.
> duh.
> 
> --kaus
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Risto Järvinen <rjarvine@cc.hut.fi>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: _PLEASE_ stop babbling about religion [OT] (was Re: A89:
> Re:OT:darwin)
> 
> 
> >
> > On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Serial wrote:
> > > *hands riba some pepto bismal*
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > To sensor this would be to break Mr. Freedom
> > > Of speech. Now I know it's off topic but what percisly is the topic.
> >
> > I'm willing to relocate Mr Freedom to talk.origins.  Though, if he needs
> > to be 'broken' I'll be happy to crack his kneekaps with a baseball bat :-)
> >
> >
> > > Assembly 89? Is this any worse then all the people complaining about the
> 8k
> > > limit or crying that they have Hw2 and want to get a refund.
> >
> > Well, that almost fits under topic of Assembly-89.  At least it's about
> '89.
> > Religion is _way_ out of topic.  (Unless you worship '89, of course)
> >
> >
> > > I dont like getting mail about that but I dont care if you send it, my
> > > delete key works just as good as the next guys
> >
> > How about those who receive this list digested?  It's real fun editing
> > digests later.  The point is, by continuing to post offtopic messages to a
> > mailing list you are violating ticalc policies and netiquette.
> >
> >
> >
> > > If you think it's lame you can modify your client to not recieve
> messages
> > > containing god/religion/darwin/evolution and remain sheltered in your
> > > calculator fantasy. If all you do is play with your calculators maybe
> > > insiting some anger is good for you.
> >
> > Don't get personal.  I do live in fantasy consisting of my subjective
> > perceptions of the so-called reality but what does it have to do with
> > this?
> >
> > I've had my share of religious discussions and they usually are flooded
> > with 'lame' comments because people just don't know but still they keep
> > insisting on what they think.  Besides all should know that God isn't the
> > answer, the Answer to life, universe and everything is 42.  Now shut up.
> >
> >
> > - Riba
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Risto Järvinen <rjarvine@cc.hut.fi>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 3:17 PM
> > > Subject: _PLEASE_ stop babbling about religion [OT] (was Re: A89: Re:
> > > OT:darwin)
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I read even one more lame religious conversion attempt or lame
> > > > darwinistic comment I'm going to throw up.  (In fact, I already threw
> up
> > > > while writing this)
> > > >
> > > > Could the list maintainers please temporarily ban the people who still
> > > > continue offtopic discussion?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Riba
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > PS.  As a comment to this lame discussion / guessing game about origin
> of
> > > > man and Earth, read the "http://www.talkorigins.org".  It has
> extensive
> > > > documentation on the subject.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 11 Dec 1999 TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In a message dated 12/11/99 5:42:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > > > > Serial@earthlink.net writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ouch.... short time? it's been around 4+ billion years. In that
> time A
> > > 6
> > > > > >  million foot rock could be worn down to the size of a golf ball
> by
> > > air
> > > > > >  erosion. There is no limit to the test of time.
> > > > >
> > > > > if the earth is like a rock, then would it not also be worn down to
> the
> > > size
> > > > > of a golf ball?  If this is true (l don't know if it is or not),
> even
> > > then
> > > > > what you are saying is that the earth could only have existed for a
> few
> > > > > thousand years because otherwise it would be less than the size of a
> > > golf
> > > > > ball.  Also, the force of gravity tends to keep most rocks and other
> > > objects
> > > > > at whereever they started at (if a planet). :)
> > > > >
> > > > > --TurboSoft
> > > > >
> > > > > Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE:  The most current Basic and C programs
> > > created
> > > > > by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> > > > > <A
> HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>
References: