Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin
From: David Martin <davediego@geocities.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 23:33:19 -0800
References: <0.ac18994d.25842b51@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


that one specimen doesnt grow the eye, its offspring many genrations down will
finally grow the eye. it keeps progressing from 1 light sensitive cell, to the
whole eye, with millions of that species of animal living and dying before the
eye is finally acheived

TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 12/11/99 4:41:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> davediego@geocities.com writes:
>
> > turbosoft, i remember u asking what "caused" something to grow an eye, well
> > if
> >  the little microorganism kept swimmnig into the superheated water cause it
> >  couldnt tell wtf it was doing or going, dont u think that something that
> > could
> >  even remotely tell what it was doing would live longer?
>
> so, assuming that this "something" lived a life more or less near the same
> span as animals today, could it grow an eye in its lifetime?  Also, according
> to what you say its lifespan would be even shorter...
>
> >  i sure as hell do,
> > and
> >  all these little advancements built up over BILLIONS of years, ur
> forgetting
> >  just how long the earth has been around, thats how evolution is sound
>
> are we also forgetting the mass of evidence that points to how _short_ the
> earth has been around?
>
> --TurboSoft
>
> Visit the TURBOSOFT HOMEPAGE:  The most current Basic and C programs created
> by TurboSoft for the 89, and the most 89 web links.
> <A HREF="http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/">http://turbosoft.ticalc.org/</A>

References:

Re: A89: Re: OT: darwin

From: TurboSoft@aol.com