Re: A89: Ah-ha, I figured out why TI limited the user-archive on HW1 cal
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Ah-ha, I figured out why TI limited the user-archive on HW1 calcs, ...
That's what it looks like to me. But, I'm prone to be wrong.
Eric Greening
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, December 11, 1999 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Ah-ha, I figured out why TI limited the user-archive on
HW1 calcs, ...
>
>So basically, TI made a mistake and therefore they physically can NOT give
>HW1 users the full 700k for use of archive or flash apps?
>
>Bryan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <KeysDezes@aol.com>
>To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 12:02 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: Ah-ha, I figured out why TI limited the user-archive on
>HW1 calcs, ...
>
>
>>
>> I tried pointing this out earlier. This is not intentional malice. On
HW
>> 2.00, you actually get 700 kb for use as archive or Flash apps. On HW
>> 1.00...oops. TI goofed and screwed those of us who bought an 89 a long
>time
>> ago. Instead of extra space, the reapportionment gives us less. But it's
>a
>> mistake, not just TI being rude again.
>>
>> Grant Elliott
>> <A
>> HREF="http://www.crosswinds.net/~proganon">Programmers Anonymous</A>
>>
>>
>
>
>