Re: A89: compiler

Re: A89: compiler

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: compiler
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 00:10:10 +0200
• References: <19990917034505.84555.qmail@hotmail.com> <v04210100b407fb8d82d1@[24.5.218.218]> <37E25458.7FF7C8A0@hem.passagen.se> <v04210101b408697a5c0c@[24.5.218.218]>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

there must be 68k compilers for mac.  old macs even ran on 68000 processors :)
maybe you need to write a linker though.
they should be more common than 68k assemblers running on pc's...

//Olle

Daniel wrote:
> 
> >what would then the point of having the compiler on calc be?
> >It makes the on-calc compiler even more pointless...
> >as long as you can't have it as a flash-applet (or what they are called) so it
> >isn't erased when your calc crashes, it is quite useless to programm with..
> >cause it WILL crash. not even the best of programmers write totally
> >bugfree code
> >immidiatly.
> >
> >//Olle
> 
> Umm what about us mac users that don't have a compiler otherwise?

• Re: A89: compiler
• From: Daniel <dsrogers@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

• A89: compiler
• From: "Matt Baker" <po2084@hotmail.com>
• Re: A89: compiler
• From: Daniel <dsrogers@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
• Re: A89: compiler
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Re: A89: compiler
• From: Daniel <dsrogers@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

• Prev: A89: Wlink89
• Next: A89: RE: A Radio Link idea (Distance and updated)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread