Re: A89: C and 68k?

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: C and 68k?
From: "Pat J" <pat@jalyn.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 21:35:13 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


It can't be that much of a difference because TI programs the TI-89 in C.
You know the ROM calls and stuff.
     Pat
________________
   pat@jalyn.com
http://come.to/patj/
-----Original Message-----
From: BLoWh0Le@aol.com <BLoWh0Le@aol.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, September 27, 1998 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: A89: C and 68k?


>
>In a message dated 98-09-27 21:39:58 EDT, you write:
>
><< Are C and 68k languages alike? >>
>
>i don't think so.  but then again i'm probably wrong.
>
>C is a programming language.
>68k is a motorola processor.
>there might be a C compiler for the 68k, but i wouldn't know.
>otherwise, i think you have to program in pure asm for the 68k.
>

Prev: Re: A89: C and 68k?
Next: A89: Internal Clock?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread