uhh, i'm thinking not. first, it may look like the 83
and 86, but it's not the same. or based on the same as you put
it. i don't think the BASIC functions are anywhere near that of the
89.
anyway, i'll stop now because i don't want to start this big
thingy.
At 04:37 PM 9/9/98, you wrote:
>
>NO, the TI-89 is based on the TI-83 on most of the BASIC functions
and the
>way the keys are laid out.
> Pat
>________________
> pat@jalyn.com
>http://come.to/patj/
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robby Gutmann <gutmann@planet-connect.com>
>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
<assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 4:17 PM
>Subject: Re: A89: annoying little quirks
>
>
>>
>>>Actually, the TI-89 is a mix between The TI-92 and the
TI-83.
>>> Pat
>>
>>You'se so wrong, it's not even funny. Actually, it is kinda
funny.
>>HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!. Anyway, you're wrong, and the other guy is
too (but
>>you're more wrong than he is). The TI-89 is completely
based on the
>>TI-92+. Absolutely nothing to do with the 83, except for
possibly the
>>case, and I would opine that that is based on the 86, rather than
the 83.
>>So, the moral of the story, girls and boys, is don't say stupid
things.
>>Cuz the Aardvark, or me (when I have time), will catch you on
them, and
>>make you feel stupid.
>>
>>Robby Gutmann
>>gutmann@planet-connect.com
>>ICQ UIN: 724927 Agonostis on
IRC
>>
>>Of course, Ankh-Morpork's citizens had always claimed that the
river water
>>was incredibly pure. Any water that had passed through so many
kidneys,
>>they reasoned, had to be very pure indeed.
>> -- (Terry Pratchett, Sourcery)
>>
>>
>
{-kimo-}
Summers never live up to your expectations . . .
-kimo
_____________________________________
References: