Re: A89: TI discussion board.

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: TI discussion board.
From: "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 23:40:09 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org



What do you think a hack is?  TI didn't want or intend for that, so it's by
definition a hack ... even if it is comparitively simple.


>
>Both of you are INCORRECT! The TI-89/TI-92 Plus board was NOT HACKED! It is
>SIMPLE HTML in the subject fields of messages. Then the author posted a
>blank message with some screwy coding in the subject. Someone responded to
>this, and, thus, you get a javascript error. The POSTS ARE STILL THERE.
>Just click for a different view to see the messages.
>
>At 10:24 PM 10/3/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>In a message dated 10/3/98 7:57:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
gutmann@planet-
>>connect.com writes:
>>
>>> This is pretty off-topic; I try to check the TI 89/92+ discussion group
>>>  once or twice a day.  Yesterday, i went there, and it had been hacked,
and
>>>  someone had put porn on there.  (cheap, nasty cindy crawford fakes, if
>>>  anyone cares.)  So, i went back today, and I get a JavaScript error,
and
>>>  the page doesn't load.  Anyone know what's up?
>>
>>when l went, all the pictures and messages before them had been removed.
>>three messages only were there.
>>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: TI discussion board.

From: TI-89 Calc <ti89calc@midsouth.rr.com>

Re: A89: TI discussion board.

From: TI-89 Calc <ti89calc@midsouth.rr.com>