Re: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)

Re: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)
• From: Xavier VASSOR - The Doors Team <doors@altern.org>
• Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 17:59:02 +0100
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <365971DB.2E0BF061@hem.passagen.se>
• References: <00cc01be16a2$afdf1ba0$ad46fea9@eddie>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

At 15:31 23/11/98 +0100, you wrote:
>
>It is certainly not 8bit.  you can easily see that on the instructions
>available..  the 68k is some weird mix of 16 and 32bit architechture so noone
>really knows if its 16 or 32 bit :)  the fans say 32bit and the other say
16bit
>:)
What i heard is that it is 16-bit but with some 32 bit abilities..


Xavier VASSOR
---The Doors Team
E-mail:xvassor@mail.dotcom.fr
Doors Homepage: http://www.altern.org/doors
ICQ:10241721

• Re: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)
• From: Nathan Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>

• Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
• From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
• A89: number of bits in the 68k :)
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

• Prev: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)
• Next: Re: A89: number of bits in the 68k :)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread