Re: A89: Re: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Re: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
>As I think I said before, the libraries would be best used if we had a
>limited number of them, such
>as three or four. Every library would contain all the code to all related
>current libraries. So
>there would be a library for graphics, a library for compression, and a
>library for misc utils and
>such. I think most library functions would be broken down into these
>three categories. The util
>lib might be larger than the other two, especially the compress lib, but I
>think they would still be
>small enough to serve their function.
I think from the point of view of the user, it would be best to simply
combine these three libraries into one. Since the're pretty standard stuff
it wouldn't be a problem. You must remember that the people using these
programs aren't as calculator savy as you are. I think that we could make
the small developer-end sacrafice to make it easier for the user.
--Nate
Follow-Ups:
References: