Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
From: BLoWh0Le@aol.com
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 15:48:42 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

In a message dated 11/12/98 8:37:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
Daniel7073@aol.com writes:

<< >>I think the calculator should have a library, but only one.  If there was
 one
 >>big library that went into the TI-89 and did what all the libraries
existing
 >>did, that would be easier and still save some space. If we had a lot of
 >>libraries (like we do now),  that would make it more confusing and a big
 >>hassle to keep track and upgrade them.
 >>						-Jeff >>

No, a really big library would be a waste of space.  I'd rather have a lot of
libraries and a little confusion than one library and wasted space.  Besides,
I think this whole library/kernel thing is mostly just BS.  It's not that hard
to copy a few libraries and a kernel to your calculator.  Perhaps a FAQ would
better suit our situation.  And it would be a hella lot better than having
someone ask about libraries everyday.

Prev: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
Next: A89: Re: unsubcribe
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread