Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
At 16:00 1998-11-11 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Should the next version of PlusShell default to outputting assembly programs
>which require no kernel or libraries?
Here are my thoughts about this issue:
* Programs should NOT require any shell as default
* Program not requiring a shell should still be able to use
the functions in the library. When compiling, the functions in
the library should then be added at the end of the source code
(this might cause complications if library functions calls each other)
* An Anti-crash system should be a separate program. I remember that
there was such a program for Fargo, which was run separately.
Conclusion: programs could be release in two version; one which requires
a shell & libraries, and the other have the function used statically
included. When compiling, a switch could decide which of the version
is to be compiled.
--
Real name: Jimmy Mårdell
Email: mailto:yarin@acc.umu.se
Homepage: http://www.acc.umu.se/~yarin/
Icarus Productions homepage: http://icarus.ganymed.org/
Follow-Ups:
References: