Re: A89: Zelda 89
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Zelda 89
I run of...I just dont know what your talking about....People say I just talk
and talk and talk and talk...oh sorry but I dont know where they get that from
do you I mean......hey are you making fun of me....hehe......I dont run on my
sentences .....cause I know darn well run on's are bad too so I never do that I
always use perfect sentence structure.....boy I am going to be screwed if I
actually need help with some asm programming arn't I...?.......O well I can buy
a book or something ...like a book from barns and nobel or borders.....do you
like borders....they serve food there while you read the books you might want to
buy and ......you know !
Chris Bower wrote:
> Hey, uh, Serial. Have you ever heard of a run-on? Say it with me now:
> Run-on's=BAD
> Correct Sentences=GOOD
> Good Boy...
>
> BTW... Maybe it's your friends who have the problem and the freshmen just
> have better judgement... Who knows, but it's a thought...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serial <Serial@Earthlink.net>
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Thursday, December 17, 1998 10:37 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Zelda 89
>
> >
> >That is mean at 15 a freshman can really get ..... wait your right. I was
> going
> >to say that they start to get ****friendly**** at least females but the
> ones
> >that hang with me have a strange problem with throwing rocks at my friends
> so
> >your right, we had a bunch of freshmen try to raid the area we hang out in
> but
> >we hang out in at the beginning of the year but how we got rid of em is a
> long
> >story that someone else on this group can tell you if you want, he is joe
> koston
> >(perhaps the best basic programmer I have ever seen) :)
> >
> >Chris Bower wrote:
> >
> >> Oh, I'm sorry... Yeah, I was _REALLY_ trying to hyperextend your point on
> >> the age message with sacrcasm... Give me a break man. Stop trying to pick
> on
> >> people for something you know nothing about... FYI I'm 17 and freshmen
> are
> >> the only people I pick on for their age.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Serial <Serial@Earthlink.net>
> >> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >> Date: Thursday, December 17, 1998 10:26 PM
> >> Subject: Re: A89: Zelda 89
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Unfortionately I am not going to say it again so read back post and you
> >> will
> >> >find out the millions and billions of things wrong with your post but if
> >> you
> >> >think I am immature then live with it because unless you want to join
> the
> >> >discussion your opinion means nothing to me.
> >> >
> >> >btw. 'baby', you hyperextended my point from the age message.
> >> >
> >> >Chris Bower wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> You know, bully's usually bully because of an inferiority problem...
> >> What's
> >> >> the matter Serial? Feeling jealous because those mean old people at
> CCIA
> >> (no
> >> >> offense CCIA) won't let you have a bet copy of Zelda? Aww.... Poor
> baby.
> >> >> Lose the attitude and stop flaming man. The only thing you are proving
> is
> >> >> your immaturity.
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Serial <Serial@Earthlink.net>
> >> >> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >> >> Date: Thursday, December 17, 1998 9:57 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: A89: Zelda 89
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You actually read that? I havn't even read it. Well that's all nice
> and
> >> >> crap but I pay for my own
> >> >> >ISP. Lets see see what your ISP covers as far as threatening and such
> >> shall
> >> >> we.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Network unfriendly activity:
> >> >> > Activities which adversely affect the ability of
> >> other
> >> >> people or systems to use
> >> >> >PDQ.net
> >> >> > services or the Internet is prohibited.
> >> >> >*Hmmm...Jackass consitiutes pretty unfriendly activity. Better look
> out.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Harassment:
> >> >> > Sending threatening or harassing e-mail after
> being
> >> >> requested to stop, is
> >> >> >prohibited.
> >> >> > Extremely threatening or harassing e-mail is
> >> prohibited
> >> >> always.
> >> >> >Stop calling me names and violating my harassing me.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Off-topic or inappropriate postings:
> >> >> > There is no restriction on content, except as
> defined
> >> by
> >> >> each newsgroup.
> >> >> >Continued
> >> >> > posting of off-topic articles is prohibited.
> Please
> >> note
> >> >> that commercial
> >> >> >advertisements are
> >> >> > off-topic in the vast majority of newsgroups.
> >> >> >Of course earthlink doesn't have an off-topic rule like your ISP so
> >> watch
> >> >> out.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I could go of if you want to play *Lawyer debait* but I will likely
> win
> >> >> since I have done this many
> >> >> >times before and as you can see I am still on the net. Besides this
> >> isn't a
> >> >> newsgroup it is a
> >> >> >*e-mail connection* so dont pretend that you can get earthlink to
> kick
> >> me
> >> >> off for e-mail cause it
> >> >> >wont happen. Seriously man I dont see why you wanted to get involved
> in
> >> >> this anyway?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Charles Vaughn wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> HEY JACKASS!!!!!!!!!!!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Have you read earthlinks acceptable use policy latley?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2.10. Disrupting any newsgroup with *frivolous, excessively
> vulgar*,
> >> or
> >> >> >> *repetitious* postings.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Ohh, I bet your parents will be real happy when you precious little
> >> >> internet connection is taken
> >> >> >> away.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Oh and like you are a great speller as well
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> for no reaso so you
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Serial wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Wow, this person certainly is retarded. Using words like
> 'problebly'
> >> >> reinforces my suspisions
> >> >> >> > that you dont know what the hell this is all about so who is
> really
> >> the
> >> >> jackass.
> >> >> >> > Kent brockman reporting: "I say they are both jackasses"
> >> >> >> > I agree Kent.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Charles Vaughn wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > > Wow, this person certainly has the right to call another person
> >> rude.
> >> >> This is possibly one
> >> >> >> > > of the most selfish people I have meat on this list. You need
> to
> >> >> understand that Zelda 89
> >> >> >> > > is their game. A controled early beta test is very useful for
> >> >> finding bugs. I would be
> >> >> >> > > more than happy to get the game, how ever I will be patient and
> >> wait
> >> >> for the public beta
> >> >> >> > > test. And you probably won't be able to get it from any of the
> >> >> testers. CCIA was probably
> >> >> >> > > smart and didn't give it to jackasses like your self.
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > Serial wrote:
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > > oh you must be one of those stupid bastards who banned me
> from
> >> the
> >> >> #CCIA room on EFnet
> >> >> >> > > > for no reaso so you can just shut the fuck up bastard, I am
> >> talking
> >> >> to humans who arn't
> >> >> >> > > > run by your rude ass totaliaristic bastards society so dont
> talk
> >> to
> >> >> me about beta
> >> >> >> > > > testers privilages. To all you nice people out there the
> >> queestion
> >> >> rides but send it to
> >> >> >> > > > me privately now so they dont know who did it and I will post
> >> it.
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > Sorry for the language to all people except the CCIA team.
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > David Martin wrote:
> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > any testers who give away the beta loose their priveleges
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > Serial wrote:
> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> > > > > > If anyone has zelda 89 can they please post in on this
> >> group.
> >> >> CCIA said there are
> >> >> >> > > > > > 10 beta testers and I assume at least one of them is on
> this
> >> >> group.
> >> >> >> > > > > > Thanks a bunch,
> >> >> >> > > > > > Serial
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >
References: