Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)
From: TurboSoft@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 22:38:28 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


In a message dated 12/4/98 8:19:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, justin-b@juno.com
writes:

> The organization idea is very intriguing, but how will the reviewers be
>  compensated for their efforts?  Why might they work for free when the
>  programmers whose games they are approving are making money?  To account
>  for this, I propose that any programmers submitting thieir games for
>  approval should pay some sort of fee, but no more than $5 or $10.  Also,
>  this committee shouldn't be greater than five people, who each review it
>  based on a clear and meaningful definition of excellence.

When people have to pay for games play on the calculator is the day that l
quit.
--TurboSoft

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

From: Eric Meeks <shaggy@popi.net>

Prev: Re: A89: Re: Holy god what did i do???????
Next: Re: A89: Starting out assembly, need help
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread