A89: Re: Perverted :)

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A89: Re: Perverted :)
From: Mark Zavislak <felix@megsinet.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 16:31:47 -0600
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <v04011700b28d27734044@[146.151.40.69]>
References: <4.1.19981203233538.0095db60@mail.iland.net> <00c001be1f3d$a2fcdfa0$4d10e6a5@Sammy.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>>Dux Gregis enlightened me with:
>>->
>>->well, you know what that means ... you can write a program that will only
>>->work on only one calc, relieving the privacy problem of paying for calc
>>->programs
>>
>>so you're saying that the EE pro software that can be bought isn't
>>"pirateable?"  or is it?  this is a question i've had for awhile.
>
>Hmm, I hope not.  I always liked the free softwear comunity.  Selling stuff
>wouldn't be any good for us.
>
>	--Nate


It is very interesting to take a look at the back side of the TI-89
Packaging.  There is a patent listed that it Licensed by RSA Data Security.
This probably means that they implement RSA signature systems to make it
extremely hard to hack.  It would be a fun thing to investigate...

References:

Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

From: --Alex <keymo@stones.com>

Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

From: "Dux Gregis" <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>

Re: A89: Re: Perverted :)

From: Nathan Mueller <nlmueller@students.wisc.edu>