Re: A89: Basic -- Proposition/ldea (please read important)

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Basic -- Proposition/ldea (please read important)
From: TGaArdvark@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 21:06:06 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


> Do you really think we need multiple BASIC lists?  I mean, that is what
> the TI-BASIC is for.

Like I said, a list for 8x basic and another for 89/92/92+ basic would
be a good idea.  There is a big difference between those two categories
of basic.  In the past, I just deleted letters about the latter form since
I was not very familiar with it.  Now that I am getting an 89, that will
change, but there are plenty of others in this situation.

Follow-Ups:

Re: A89: Basic -- Proposition/ldea (please read important)

From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>

Prev: Owners (was A89: Basic...)
Next: Re: A89: Basic -- Proposition/ldea (please read important)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread