Re: A86: Re: brian, quit it!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: brian, quit it!
Obviously you know nothing about me... even though I don't code assembly, I do
know BASIC quite damn well and other languages for the PC.
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: <Idanny99@aol.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: brian, quit it!
>
> Obviously, he knows next to nothing. He said:
> > you are no doubt an great programmer. you have released numerous projects
> > and have done much for the ti commmunity. i commend you for your efforts,
> > but i urge you to move on from this matter. you are accomplishing
> > nothing.
> which shows he knows nothing about you seeing as your not a programmer, and
> it would have been more appropriate to e-mail you directly and not to the
> list. If he has any feeling about this matter, it's between you and him, the A
> SSEMBLY 86 list doesn't care about this, this is for ASM programmers trying
> to get help. Please keep non-A86 topics off of the A86 list, since that is
> what makes A86 one of the better mailing list from ticalc.org.
>
>
> Thankyou,
> Danny
> ZAPO - zapo.calc.org
>
>
>
> In a message dated 1/14/00 2:23:53 PM Central Standard Time,
> rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu writes:
>
> << Well, no country today has a perfect communist government, and no country
> ever
> has. I never alleged that ticalc.org is perfectly communist. The way they
> go
> about things and the way the coordinators act is basically communist. It is
> certainly not democracy. They even justified the coordinator system from the
> very start by saying that the whole staff wasn't competent enough to make
> decisions as a whole, and the coordinators needed to be there to make the
> decisions. Now that is not government of the people, by the people, and for
> the
> power. Anyway...
>
> If you weren't around from March - April of 1999, then I can see why you
> don't
> know what I'm talking about. As I said in my previous post, I'll work on
> some
> kind of website/document that explains all this stuff.
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jimi malcolm" <malcolmj1@juno.com>
> To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 6:48 PM
> Subject: A86: brian, quit it!
>
>
> >
> > bryan,
> >
> > you just keep ranting and raving at how bad www.ticalc.org is. you're not
> > putting up much proof that i've seen (i believe you though). i think it's
> > run similiar to the way russia was over organized by their communistic
> > efforts: the coordinators, who "rule" and control every aspect of the
> > www.ticalc.org beaurocracy with an authoritarian view of obedience, claim
> > to be bettering the ti calculator industry. the only flaw in your
> > communist argument is that they are not claiming to share goods and
> > services equally. i have seen no where on www.ticalc.org that "everyone
> > has access to everything...take what you need and give your all". no
> > where! they don't meet the definition of communism. they don't even meet
> > russia's perverted view of marxist-leninist because they don't advocate
> > the overthrow of any capitalistic efforts. there isn't even a proletariat
> > to overthrow!
> >
> > so www.ticalc.org is bad, ok i'll give that one to you. now what is to be
> > done about it? can anything be done about it? is it so wrong that they
> > censor some information? i know it's not free speach but it is their
> > server; they have the final say as to what gets published and what gets
> > deleted. by agreeing to membership, you agree to abide by their rules.
> > there are disclaimers everywhere at their site. when they sent me the
> > hosting info, it was a contract of several pages. in it, they talked
> > about questionable material and remarks. they tell you from the start
> > that they won't put up with any abuse.
> >
> > so, really, what has www.ticalc.org done so wrong? can you make a list so
> > we will all be informed? i would greatly appreciate it if you would spell
> > out their faults? they are still the best service (with
> > www.dimension-ti.org in a close second) out there. i know no other equal.
> > if they were to crash like your communist russia, where would we be. so
> > they've automated the system, taken out the human touch, this could lead
> > to more features. everyone seems to be getting by as is.
> >
> > i was never a part of your ordeal with www.ticalc.org. i know nothing
> > outside of the numerous frivolous postings on the asm86 list. they seem
> > to be getting you no where. you are almost acting like a child, calling a
> > big bully names from a distance which keeps you out of their reach. do
> > you really expect www.ticalc.org to respond to your postings? if so, what
> > do you think they will do, hand over the server to you? they've got
> > better things to do than respond to comments on all their lists. did you
> > think that they may not be responding because they aren't listening? you
> > may argue that you are making a difference, but, to some, the only
> > difference is the prolonged download time of the asm86 daily list loaded
> > with your insults.
> >
> > from the dates listed for many of www.ticalc.org's transgressions against
> > you, it seems months ago. have you done anything since but sulk?
> >
> > if i am wrong in what i am saying, i can only offer my apologies. i may
> > not then have the full story. i am only, like many others on this list,
> > frustrated at your wasted attempts at insulting www.ticalc.org.
> >
> > you are no doubt an great programmer. you have released numerous projects
> > and have done much for the ti commmunity. i commend you for your efforts,
> > but i urge you to move on from this matter. you are accomplishing
> > nothing.
> >
> > jimi malcolm
> > mailto:malcolmj1@juno.com
> > http://guide.ticalc.org
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
> > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
> > Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
> > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
> >
> > >>
>
>
References: