Re: A86: Re^9e99: Re: ACZ: Re: Account Abuse
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re^9e99: Re: ACZ: Re: Account Abuse
Well, if they answered this one, they would look stupid, because there is _no_
reason to do what they did...
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jeanne9005@aol.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: A86: Re^9e99: Re: ACZ: Re: Account Abuse
>
> Hrmm.... notice they haven't answered any of your questions posted on the
mailing list...
>
> Glen
> tutorial1.cjb.net
>
> In a message dated Wed, 12 Jan 2000 9:36:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Bryan
Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu> writes:
>
> >
> > Hrmm.... notice they aren't answering this...
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <TGaArdvark@aol.com>
> > To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 12:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: A86: Re^9e99: Re: ACZ: Re: Account Abuse
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Okay, now that we suddenly have so many ticalc.org
> > > ppz talking again, how about you answer the question
> > > Bryan implied at the very beginning. What specifically
> > > did Bryan do to deserve the loss of his ability to use
> > > ticalc.org services? Let's see examples. Quotes,
> > > logs, etc. Ticalc.org would never want to keep a secret.
> > > So how about filling us in?
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
References: