Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]

Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]

• To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
• Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 21:13:57 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <19990512072608.26713.rocketmail@web117.yahoomail.com> <37398642.C45709D2@oregontrail.net> <006301be9cb8$2b01b400$8c2369d1@home1> <3739F851.796BC11E@bellatlantic.net>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

Gosh, how'd you do that?  I have my calc on several hours a night testing my
grayscale game, and I've only replaced the batteries maybe once or twice in
the last six months (too bad no AC adapter like gb :)  I even left it on all
night in my game (grayscale, with moving objects, etc.) and it only dropped
the contrast a couple of notches (that halt loop in the main loop must help
:)
>
> I use rechargebles, but the voltage is always lower. I use those cause
they
> charge 1000 times, whereas I burned a set of renewals in a semester.
> terrence

• Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
• From: warhorse <warhorse@bellatlantic.net>

• Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
• From: David Thomas <david_hd@yahoo.com>
• Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
• From: Cassady Roop <croop@oregontrail.net>
• Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
• From: "Eugene Dirks" <e1066@sherbtel.net>
• Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
• From: warhorse <warhorse@bellatlantic.net>

• Prev: Re: A86: Theory question [i think its about time we....]
• Next: Re: A86: Ethernet thread
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread