Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives


Since you say you've filtered me out, I guess you won't be reading this
e-mail. :)

ticalc.org isn't totally useless.  They are an example of what NOT to do and
an example of what happens when you let half the staff that doesn't do any
work run the lives of the other half that actually do work.

--
Bryan Rabeler
rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu
http://www.msu.edu/~rabelerb/

"I personally guarantee that there will be no 'censorship' of what he [Bryan
Rabeler] writes (as long as he keepts to the rules about such things as
language used)." - Magnus Hagander, 5 March 1999

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Richardson" <kentr@san.rr.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives


>
> You guys sound like my 3-year old twins.  Let me give you a few words of
> advice - GROW UP AND GET OVER IT!!!!  This list has become about as
useless
> as you seem to think ticalc.org is.  I've already filtered out anything
> from Bryan.  Looks like I may have to include Kirk.  You two are really a
> piece of work.
>
> At 07:13 PM 12/23/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >No where near a 3 week or even a 1 week delay though..
> >
> >Bryan
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kirk Meyer" <kirkmeyer@bigfoot.com>
> >To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:03 PM
> >Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Bryan you did exactly the same thing when you did file archives (not
the
> >> email part, the part about giving precedence to assembly) so I don't
even
> >> want to hear that from you. That's why I got stuck on the backup
> >> filearchives job in the first place, because you'd let so many BASIC
> >> programs build up =P
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> >> To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 3:02 PM
> >> Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
> >>
> >>
> >> > Well, I assume that "cool" assembly games probably get top priority
over
> >> > there, and then next come other assembly stuff, and BASIC probably is
> >only
> >> > added when they have time.  Seriously, I've been saying this and
> >> complaining
> >> > about this for months, glad someone also agrees with me about this
> >e-mail
> >> > thing. :)  Your absolutely right, I also rarely get e-mails back from
> >> > filearchive@ticalc.org.  It seems like with 3 people over there doing
> >the
> >> > job I used to do by myself, they could _at least_ do as good of a job
as
> >I
> >> > did, and maybe even better... :)  But thats what you get when
selfish,
> >> > greedy, out-of-touch coordinators are making all the decisions.
> >> >
> >> > Bryan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
References: