Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
<sarcasm>
I really don't think that being an active member on any of these mailing
lists should be a requirement for staffing at ticalc.org. In fact, I don't
think ticalc.org should require their staff to be active at all on the TI
scene. As long as they can run a site as fully automated as possible and
keep human interaction to a minimum, then I think its good. Experience on
IRC is a plus, and sucking up to the ops in #ti is even better..
</sarcasm>
--
Bryan Rabeler
rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu
http://www.msu.edu/~rabelerb/
"nothing important happens behind anybody's back. Everything will be
discussed on the list and everyone will be kept informed." - Chris Dornfeld,
17 November 1998
"I have also received > 20 mails from people outside our staff asking us to
kick you off the site. This is not something we'll do" - Magnus Hagander, 22
November 1998
----- Original Message -----
From: <TGaArdvark@aol.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 1999 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
>
> > Actually, yesterday and today, there have been more programs added then
in
> > past days (23 yesterday, 16 so far today). Maybe someone has actually
been
> > listening to the list and dicided to get off their ass and actually do
> > something over there.
>
> Bryan is and has always been the only active person
> who is or was a ticalc.org staffer on here. Sure Magnus
> posted once or twice, but that's gone now that he died.
>
>
References: