Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives




No where near a 3 week or even a 1 week delay though..

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Meyer" <kirkmeyer@bigfoot.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives


>
> Bryan you did exactly the same thing when you did file archives (not the
> email part, the part about giving precedence to assembly) so I don't even
> want to hear that from you. That's why I got stuck on the backup
> filearchives job in the first place, because you'd let so many BASIC
> programs build up =P
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
>
>
> > Well, I assume that "cool" assembly games probably get top priority over
> > there, and then next come other assembly stuff, and BASIC probably is
only
> > added when they have time.  Seriously, I've been saying this and
> complaining
> > about this for months, glad someone also agrees with me about this
e-mail
> > thing. :)  Your absolutely right, I also rarely get e-mails back from
> > filearchive@ticalc.org.  It seems like with 3 people over there doing
the
> > job I used to do by myself, they could _at least_ do as good of a job as
I
> > did, and maybe even better... :)  But thats what you get when selfish,
> > greedy, out-of-touch coordinators are making all the decisions.
> >
> > Bryan
>
>
>
>



Follow-Ups: References: