Re: A86: Re: development environment [OT]


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: Re: development environment [OT]




I'm just saying that UltraEdit has saved my life.... it is AWESOME!

You MUST get it


Brent
----- Original Message -----
From: Akshay Dhalwala <akdjr@softhome.net>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: development environment [OT]



actually the best editor for HTML is . . .
Notepad!!! =)

akshay
http://akdjr.8m.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: development environment


>
> I've never used it, but if you edit assembly source code with it, I'm sure
> it's a plain text editor and won't screw stuff up.  The only things that
> will screw up HTML is WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) editors like
> Front Page.  IMHO, the best editor for HTML is HomeSite or ColdFusion
> Studio, which is one of the main reasons I use NT rather than Linux
(besides
> the fact that sane people don't write GUI apps like tile and map editors
for
> X :)
>
> > Yeah, everything is better than wordpad, but i mean, does it have all
the
> > extra stuff for when making web pages (hosing effects) or is it a
straight
> > text editor?
> >
> > Glen
> > tutorial1.cjb.net
> >
> > In a message dated 12/6/99 8:41:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > ComAsYuAre@aol.com writes:
> >
> > >
> > >  Wordpad has bells and whistles?!?!  LOL!!!
> > >
> > >  But seriously, Ultra Edit is way better than wordpad.
>
>
>
>








References: