Re: A86: missing shell version???
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: missing shell version???
I figured that. I was talking about version .9, which isn't as good as ASE
1.0 (IMHO!). I prefer ASE 1.0 to 1.3 because 1.0 doesn't have the delete
option or the menu. I like the one-button commands.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmed El-Helw <ahmed@ticalc.org>
To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: A86: missing shell version???
>
>its beta :)
>-Ahmed
>
>At 07:56 PM 10/13/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>I only see .9 in the ticalc archives. and the same thing in files archive
>and in
>>the dimension archives. Is there a Rascall version later than .9? I did
>not know
>>of any screen-shot feature in the version of Rascall that I have....
>>
>>Jean Vásquez
>>
>>ComAsYuAre@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> In a message dated 10/13/98 7:01:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>ahmed@ticalc.org
>>> writes:
>>>
>>> > Matt is right - Rascall is more stable and has better emulation.. The
>>> > reason it crashes on you is that you use 0.9, wheras I have .96 :)
>.96 has
>>> > an on feature that allows you to stop a program in the middle, change
>the
>>> > contrast, turn your calc off, take a screenshot... its cool.. and
>doesn't
>>> > crash as much as ASE.. at least 1.3..
>>> >
>>> > -Ahmed
>>>
>>> is .96 released yet? i thought .9 was the latest of rascall.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Ahmed El-Helw
>ahmed@ticalc.org
>http://www.ticalc.org
>_____________________________
>http://hail.icestorm.net/asm
>ICQ : 3350394